Consciousness of the Real — Conclusion — Sylvain Lebel

This model is certainly not perfect, but it presents a universe that is not an empty space filled with separate objects, but a single substance in continuous transformation, organizing itself into networks, vortices, forms, memories, consciousnesses — and ultimately, into worlds. We would not be beings external to this dynamic, but its local expressions, its provisional centers of complexity.

Everything we call "matter," "energy," "space," or "time" would be nothing more than a way for THAT — the substance of the real — to disperse, to expand, to contract, to explore itself under the constraints of its own dynamic. What we call "laws of physics" would be the consequences of this internal dynamic, governed by the need to reduce tension. Even consciousness, in this framework, does not appear as a miracle, but as the natural means by which THAT perceives, regulates, and orients itself.

This does not make life less mysterious, but differently mysterious. Existence would no longer be a strangeness at the heart of emptiness, but the emergence of an inner meaning within reality — a meaning not given from the outside, but conquered from within, through the ever more subtle organization of this original substance.

Matter, in this sense, is only a springboard. Life, a bifurcation. And the mind, perhaps, the tool through which THAT learns to return to itself. If the universe is a self-organizing dynamic, then its most complex products are not anomalies, but inflection points — where the inner side of reality seeks to unfold itself consciously.

This model does not claim to explain all phenomena, nor to eliminate mystery. It merely proposes a new coherence between what we perceive, what we think, and what we are. It asserts that the complexity of the real is not accidental, but necessary; that the order of the world is not imposed from without, but induced from within; and that the strange harmony between the universe and human intelligence is not a coincidence, but perhaps, a co-emergence. What remains is to live in accordance with this vision: not as separate beings, but as centers of transformation in the moving body of the real.

What remains is to live in accordance with this vision: not as separate beings, but as centers of transformation in the moving body of the real.